Review



tox  (Miltenyi Biotec)


Bioz Verified Symbol Miltenyi Biotec is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Miltenyi Biotec manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 95

    Structured Review

    Miltenyi Biotec tox
    Tox, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 230 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pm42503479-86-39-40?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 230 article reviews
    tox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec tox
    Tox, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pm42503479-86-39-40?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec pe recombinant anti human tox rea473
    Pe Recombinant Anti Human Tox Rea473, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pmc13401735-1065-0-7?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    pe recombinant anti human tox rea473 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec anti mouse tox pe
    Anti Mouse Tox Pe, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pmc13235417-1158-0-4?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti mouse tox pe - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Miltenyi Biotec apc tox
    Apc Tox, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__04__30__721618-179-28-29?v=Miltenyi+Biotec
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    apc tox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Protox Therapeutics web based tox prediction tool
    Web Based Tox Prediction Tool, supplied by Protox Therapeutics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pm42041868-66-13-18?v=Protox+Therapeutics
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    web based tox prediction tool - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Cedarlane guinea pig complement
    HKU1 antibody reactivity was protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection but increased the risk of post-COVID symptoms in vaccinated, infection-naive individuals (A) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels (HKU1, OC43, NL63, and 229E; log-transformed data) at baseline, between individuals infected and those who were not at the one-year follow-up. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 700, infected = 509, uninfected = 191). (B) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second vaccine dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the one-year follow-up. (C) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels at baseline, between individuals who developed post-COVID symptoms versus those who did not, by the one-year follow-up visit. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 509, post-COVID symptoms = 165, no post-COVID symptoms = 335; missing data = 9). (D) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of post-COVID symptoms at the one-year follow-up. (B and D) Show adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals on a logarithmic scale (in blue) where the dashed horizontal line indicates no effect (OR = 1), with corresponding p -values (in red). (E–G) Antibody-dependent <t>complement</t> deposition (ADCD) between individuals with the highest (78 th centile, n = 88) and lowest (22 nd centile, n = 88) HKU1 spike (E), SARS-CoV-2 S1 (F) and S2 (G) IgG levels. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For (A, C, E–G) data are shown as box (median, with lower/higher quartiles)-and-whiskers (upper whisker: Q3+1.5xIQR, lower whisker: Q1-1.5xIQR) plots, with all data points. For (B, D): Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (blue line) and p value (in red), on a log scale. (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001).
    Guinea Pig Complement, supplied by Cedarlane, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/tox/pmc12999348-30-0-4?v=Cedarlane
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    guinea pig complement - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    HKU1 antibody reactivity was protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection but increased the risk of post-COVID symptoms in vaccinated, infection-naive individuals (A) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels (HKU1, OC43, NL63, and 229E; log-transformed data) at baseline, between individuals infected and those who were not at the one-year follow-up. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 700, infected = 509, uninfected = 191). (B) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second vaccine dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the one-year follow-up. (C) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels at baseline, between individuals who developed post-COVID symptoms versus those who did not, by the one-year follow-up visit. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 509, post-COVID symptoms = 165, no post-COVID symptoms = 335; missing data = 9). (D) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of post-COVID symptoms at the one-year follow-up. (B and D) Show adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals on a logarithmic scale (in blue) where the dashed horizontal line indicates no effect (OR = 1), with corresponding p -values (in red). (E–G) Antibody-dependent complement deposition (ADCD) between individuals with the highest (78 th centile, n = 88) and lowest (22 nd centile, n = 88) HKU1 spike (E), SARS-CoV-2 S1 (F) and S2 (G) IgG levels. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For (A, C, E–G) data are shown as box (median, with lower/higher quartiles)-and-whiskers (upper whisker: Q3+1.5xIQR, lower whisker: Q1-1.5xIQR) plots, with all data points. For (B, D): Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (blue line) and p value (in red), on a log scale. (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001).

    Journal: iScience

    Article Title: HKU1 immune imprinting is associated with post-COVID symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection

    doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2026.115175

    Figure Lengend Snippet: HKU1 antibody reactivity was protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection but increased the risk of post-COVID symptoms in vaccinated, infection-naive individuals (A) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels (HKU1, OC43, NL63, and 229E; log-transformed data) at baseline, between individuals infected and those who were not at the one-year follow-up. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 700, infected = 509, uninfected = 191). (B) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second vaccine dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection at the one-year follow-up. (C) Comparison of HCoV spike IgG levels at baseline, between individuals who developed post-COVID symptoms versus those who did not, by the one-year follow-up visit. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test ( n = 509, post-COVID symptoms = 165, no post-COVID symptoms = 335; missing data = 9). (D) Effects of HCoV spike IgG levels, time interval between the first and second dose (days), use of mRNA vaccines only, sex, and age at baseline, on the risk of post-COVID symptoms at the one-year follow-up. (B and D) Show adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals on a logarithmic scale (in blue) where the dashed horizontal line indicates no effect (OR = 1), with corresponding p -values (in red). (E–G) Antibody-dependent complement deposition (ADCD) between individuals with the highest (78 th centile, n = 88) and lowest (22 nd centile, n = 88) HKU1 spike (E), SARS-CoV-2 S1 (F) and S2 (G) IgG levels. Comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. For (A, C, E–G) data are shown as box (median, with lower/higher quartiles)-and-whiskers (upper whisker: Q3+1.5xIQR, lower whisker: Q1-1.5xIQR) plots, with all data points. For (B, D): Odds Ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (blue line) and p value (in red), on a log scale. (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, and ∗∗∗ p < 0.001).

    Article Snippet: Guinea pig complement , Cedarlane , Cat# CL4051.

    Techniques: Infection, Comparison, Transformation Assay, Vaccines, Whisker Assay